Thoughts on... Certain Restrictions

Ok today I promise an article with some humour. If you are uncomfortable reading about, shall we say, not safe for work material, stop reading now. The British government has recently passed a bill that places numerous restrictions on British porn. Apparently we need to draw the line somewhere because we need "a set of moral judgements" to regulate pornography. This sounds so stereotypically British that you'd be forgiven for thinking I'm making this up. Well I'm not. No really, I'm not.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-of-sex-acts-just-got-banned-in-uk-porn-9897174.html

So what exactly has been banned? Here is the list.

• Spanking
• Caning
• Aggressive Whipping (As opposed to the non-aggressive whipping).
• Penetration by any object "associated with violence" (That seems a little vague)
• Physical or Verbal abuse regardless if consensual (She hasn't been a bad girl!)
• Urolagnia (A fancy word for pissing on people)
• Role playing as non-adults
• Physical restraint
• Humiliation
• Female ejaculation (If David Cameron can't make his woman do it, no one can!)
• Strangulation
• Facesitting
• Fisting

I must admit, I'm a little unsure what to make of all this. It seems women have been unfairly targeted by this list and dominatrixes should find a new job. Honestly though, it's just hard for me not to take the piss (pun intended). The only thought going through my mind right now is if the scaling back of porn becomes a trend, we'll have sex education classes where Mr. Cholmondey-Warner gives lessons like this http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1554fc5264/the-conjugal-rights-guide.

Why bring morality into porn? It's not meant to be moral, it's watching people go at it like rabbits on a honeymoon and if it's all consensual, what is so immoral about it. Perhaps some posh tory boys see these kinds of things and have trouble maintaining their not only stiff upper lips. 

This was a lot of fun. I promise tomorrow I'll be less vulgar.

Steven